Government shake-ups this week
The political maneuvers in Botswana this week erupted with far reaching decisions, marking a shift within the country’s financial and governmental institutions. Coinciding with President Duma Boko’s State of the Nation Address, a series of high-profile leadership shake-ups rocked government and quasi-government agencies, dramatically exposing underlying tensions and questions about governance. The firing of Jennate Makgolo, Commissioner General of the Botswana Unified Revenue Service (BURS), alongside the mutual separation agreement of Bank of Botswana Governor, Cornelius Dekop and the suspension of Botswana Public Officers Medical Aid Society (BPOMAS) CEO Thulaganyo Molebatsi, has thrust Botswana’s institutional resilience onto the front pages and into the courtrooms.
ihc-hide-content ihc_mb_type=”show” ihc_mb_who=”1,4,5″ ihc_mb_template=”1″ ]
Makgolo’s dismissal as BURS Commissioner General reverberated across the country’s fiscal landscape. Her tenure stood at a delicate intersection where taxation, enforcement, and national revenue policy converged. Yet, this week, the government abruptly removed her from office, a decision Makgolo is now vigorously contesting in the High Court. Her legal challenge underscores a fraught history in Botswana where dismissals of senior civil servants have not infrequently sparked protracted legal battles over procedural fairness. This case promises to test the judiciary’s navigation of executive prerogative versus legal protections for public officers, and it throws into stark contrast the uneasy balance between politics and administration in Botswana’s public sector.
In the interim, BURS has appointed Makgolo’s deputy as acting Commissioner General, signaling a desire for administrative continuity amid the turbulence. But insiders acknowledge that this is more than a routine succession: it’s a reflection of mounting pressure within Botswana’s revenue collection agency, as the government grapples with shifting economic conditions and calls for greater transparency and efficiency. Botswana’s economy, while historically bolstered by diamond exports and prudent fiscal management, faces headwinds. Revenue authorities like BURS are under scrutiny to enhance tax collection efficacy to sustain public service delivery amidst forecasted economic contraction in 2025.
Adding another jolt to Botswana’s financial governance framework is the news surrounding Bank of Botswana Governor Cornelius Dekop. His mutual separation agreement came as a surprise to many, despite the gradual nature of the departure, with Dekop staying on until 11 February 2026. The Governor’s exit marks the end of an era defined by cautious monetary policies focused on inflation control and currency stability. His tenure coincided with strategic efforts to modernize Botswana’s financial sector, but also with increasing public and political expectations for more dynamic economic interventions amid regional and global uncertainties. Dekop’s deputy, Lesego Caster Moseki, who is set to ascend as the new Governor, inherits not only the stewardship of monetary policy but also the challenge of steering confidence in Botswana’s financial institutions through a period of palpable uncertainty.
The sudden suspension of BPOMAS CEO Thulaganyo Molebatsi adds further complexity to the unfolding saga. BPOMAS, which administers healthcare benefits for public sector workers, is critical in the social infrastructure supporting government employees. Molebatsi’s suspension came amid undisclosed allegations that have yet to be publicly elaborated, yet insiders hint it relates to governance lapses within the agency. This has sent ripples across the public sector, with many awaiting clarification to understand the scope and implications of the disruption. For employees reliant on BPOMAS, these developments trigger unease about the reliability and transparency of a key social institution in Botswana’s public service ecosystem.
These high-level personnel upheavals unfold against a backdrop of broader political recalibration. Since President Duma Boko assumed office, his administration has signaled an intent to assert firm control over government machinery, emphasizing accountability but facing accusations of abrupt and unexplained dismissals reminiscent of patterns seen under previous governments. Botswana’s tradition of stable governance is being tested as these decisions generate a mix of public anxiety and political speculation. Civil society observers and international partners watch closely to gauge whether these moves will strengthen governance by weeding out inefficiency or, conversely, erode institutional independence by politicizing top administrative appointments.
Legally, the challenge mounted by Jennate Makgolo over her dismissal puts the spotlight on Botswana’s commitment to rule of law and fair administrative processes. Historically, Botswana’s courts have occasionally reversed dismissals where procedure was found wanting, reflecting an ongoing tension between executive decisions and judicial oversight in a democracy still maturing its institutional checks and balances. Her case is likely to set precedent in clarifying the limits of presidential authority in personnel management and reinforce due process protections for senior civil servants.
Economically, the implications of this leadership shuffle are significant. Botswana’s financial institutions underpin fiscal stability in a region often marked by volatility. Any perceived instability in the Bank of Botswana or BURS risks undermining investor confidence and disrupting the delicate balance of macroeconomic stability the country has maintained for decades. The leadership changes come as Botswana grapples with a projected economic contraction in 2025, driven largely by declining diamond production and global economic pressures, emphasizing the critical need for steady and credible financial stewardship.
More broadly, these events ask hard questions about governance culture in Botswana. The dismissals and suspensions are seen by some as a hard reset by President Boko, aiming to rid the government apparatus of inefficiency or corruption. Yet critics caution against the dangers of concentrated power leading to unchecked firings and politicization of technocratic roles essential for governance continuity. The alarm raised by some public servants about precedent-setting dismissals without transparent justification reflects a deep unease about the direction of Botswana’s public administration culture.
In this turbulent chapter, Botswana’s story is unfolding, not just of dismissals and suspensions, but of a society testing its commitments to democracy and good governance under pressure. What happens next will define not only the careers of individual officials but the resilience of Botswana’s government and financial institutions as pillars of national stability and progress in an uncertain world.
[/ihc-hide-content]
